Legal · Compliance · Regulatory Framework

ENTELΞKRON Legal & Compliance Center

Contractual terms, privacy and data-governance policies, risk disclosures, token-sale conditions, AML/KYC and sanctions controls, regulatory-status notices and operational compliance references for ENTELΞKRON, ENK and the investor platform.

Important:this center is designed to document the platform's legal and compliance framework. It does not represent that TVK Labs or ENTELΞKRON is FCA-authorised, MiCA-authorised, licensed in every jurisdiction, or that any token has received regulatory approval. Regulatory classification and availability depend on the activity, jurisdiction and facts at the relevant time.

Framework updated 30 September 2026

Core documents

Sumsub

KYC / AML technology provider

Identity verification and AML screening with Sumsub

TVK Labs uses Sumsub technology within participant onboarding for identity verification and configurable KYC/AML screening workflows, including sanctions, PEP and related risk checks where enabled by the applicable verification configuration.

Sumsub is a compliance-technology provider, not ENTELΞKRON's regulator, legal adviser or independent security auditor. TVK Labs remains responsible for determining the applicable legal basis, configuring its policies and making compliance decisions for its activities.

KYC / AML process →

Regulatory watch — 30 Sep 2026

Jurisdiction-based regulatory matrix

This watchlist identifies legal frameworks that are materially relevant to current or foreseeable ENTELΞKRON activities. Inclusion does not mean registration, authorisation, approval, passporting or permission in that jurisdiction.

United Kingdom

FCA

Cryptoasset financial promotions to UK consumers are regulated. The broader FCA cryptoasset regime is scheduled to apply from 25 October 2027; the 2026 application window has opened. No FCA authorisation is claimed.

Official reference ↗
European Union / EEA

MiCA · ESMA / national competent authorities

MiCA governs public offers, admission to trading and crypto-asset services, including white-paper, notification, publication and marketing requirements subject to classification and valid exemptions.

Official reference ↗
Germany

BaFin

BaFin is the relevant German competent authority for MiCA crypto-asset service providers and token-related supervisory matters; German AML and DORA obligations can also apply depending on the activity.

Official reference ↗
United Arab Emirates · Dubai

VARA

VARA regulates virtual assets across Dubai mainland and free zones other than DIFC. Issuance and marketing are subject to specific VARA regulations, rulebooks and activity-based requirements.

Official reference ↗
United Arab Emirates · Abu Dhabi

ADGM FSRA

ADGM's FSRA maintains a virtual-asset regulatory framework covering activities including exchanges, custody and intermediaries within ADGM.

Official reference ↗
Singapore

MAS

Digital Payment Token services can fall under Singapore's Payment Services Act and MAS licensing, AML/CFT and supervisory requirements. Availability must be assessed before targeted activity.

Official reference ↗
Switzerland

FINMA

Swiss DLT securities, trading facilities, custody and financial-intermediation activities may fall within FINMA-supervised frameworks. Classification depends on the exact token and service model.

Official reference ↗
United States

SEC · FinCEN and other competent authorities

Federal securities laws apply where a crypto asset or transaction is a security or investment contract; separate Bank Secrecy Act / money-services-business obligations may arise depending on the service model. No U.S. public offer is implied.

Official reference ↗
Türkiye

SPK · MASAK

SPK supervises and authorises crypto-asset service-provider activity under Türkiye's capital-markets framework, while AML/CFT obligations are administered under the applicable MASAK framework.

Official reference ↗
Global AML / CFT

FATF standards

FATF's risk-based standards for virtual assets and VASPs inform AML/CFT, sanctions, Travel Rule and supervisory frameworks implemented by national authorities.

Official reference ↗

الامتثال

If a signed token-sale agreement, jurisdiction-specific disclosure, privacy notice, mandatory law or regulator requirement conflicts with a general website statement, the applicable mandatory rule and the more specific executed document take priority to the extent legally permitted.